Summary
The meltdown of the Japanese financial systems, which is triggered by
the sudden decrease of stock prices in the Asian stock markets, is an unprecedented
incident for the government of Japan.
The government decided to issue government bonds in the amount of 10 trillion
yen and government-guaranteed bonds in the amount of 20 trillion yen. In
total, 30 trillion yen is going to be injected in order to save banks. By
these measures, the financial crisis was alleviated for a while.
Since the government is adhering to the budget reform, they can not take
drastic plans to boost domestic demands. Facing criticism from overseas,
Prime Minister Hashimoto is placed in a position to change the budget reform
policies. In addition, taking into consideration of the requests made by
the United States, Japan has to take some measures to stimulate domestic
demands even though unwillingly.
The LDP leaders have announced the change of the government budget reform
policies one after another. Since 2 trillion yen corporate tax reduction
is insufficient, it was decided that the public investment is increased
in the supplementary budget.
However, even if we increase public works, it is still insufficient to boost
domestic demands because Japanese, who are troubled by the handling of non-performing
loans, can not come up with drastic economic measures.
Meanwhile, the improvement of infrastructure is called for in order to expand
domestic demands. In 1992, then Prime Minister Miyazawa committed himself
to improve Japanese people's life style. In 1994, the Hosokawa coalition
government put emphasis on the improvement of the infrastructure in their
budget.
However, the benefits of these policies went to the major construction companies
instead of going to consumers. There was no structural change at all.
Even if the government invested on welfare, education, or culture-oriented
projects such as parks, sewage and waterworks, welfare institutions and
research institutions, the structure in which major construction companies
enjoy the profits did not change.
Large-scale projects were canceled because the cut in expenditures was decided
in the budget of this year. Public works will be examined more carefully
under Hashimoto administration than under other administrations before.
However, we need to re-examine the socio-industrial structure where many
industries, in particular, the construction industry, are relying on the
government budget. Unless we do not change this structure, we will not be
able to boost domestic demands effectively. |